The Beer and the Telescope
avatar

During a bout of insomnia Thursday morning, around 2 am, my phone buzzed with an incoming email from the editor of L'Osservatore Romano asking if I could get them an article about the TRAPPIST-1 planets. By noon. Italian time. So I stayed up another hour -- I wasn't getting any sleep anyway -- and shipped one off to them by 3 am Tucson time. It ran in the Feb 23 edition... click here for a link. Of course, they translated it into Italian. Here is the original English text that I sent them... they edited it slightly.

I didn't get a chance to copy the Italian version before it went offline, but thankfully my Twitter friend @fabriziolab did!

Last year, a team of astronomers led by Michaël Gillon of the STAR Institute at the University of Liège in Belgium announced the discovery of three planets around a star observed by one of their telescopes, TRAPPIST South. This week they have published new results in the scientific journal Nature that expands the number of planets in this system to seven. Brother Guy Consolmagno SJ, director of the Vatican Observatory, reflects on the significance of this discovery.

“Do you believe in life elsewhere in the Universe?” It’s a question that astronomers are asked all the time. It is the right question: life in the universe is, so far, a question of belief. We have no data that says such life exists. But our faith that life is there is strong enough that we’re willing to make the effort to search for it.

With the announcement yesterday of the discovery of seven planets comparable to Earth orbiting the star TRAPPIST-1,our faith in such searches has gotten just a little bit stronger. At least three of them might be at the right temperature to support liquid water and thus the possibility of life as we know it.

Their ongoing search for planets around small, relatively cool stars in our nearby galactic neighborhood uses a pair of robotic telescopes called “TRAPPIST”; the acronym stand for the TRAnsiting Planets and PlanetesImals Small Telescope. TRAPPIST South, which made the observations reported here, is located in the Chilean desert at an observatory in La Silla run by the European Southern Observatory; its counterpart, TRAPPIST North, is located outside of Marrakesh, Morocco. The star TRAPPIST-1 bears the name of the telescope that made it famous.

While most of the excitement in the popular press has centered on the possibility that life could exist on these planets, I see a wider significance to the discovery.

It’s important to note that no one has actually seen these planets. They are too small and too faint to be visible in our current generation of telescopes. But even though we can’t see them, we believe they exist because of the effects we can see that they have on their star. This planetary system happens to be aligned so that as each planet orbits this star, it passes between the star and us; thus the starlight is slightly dimmed as the planet passes. Such an effect, though subtle, can be detected even with a small telescope. The TRAPPIST telescopes use very modest 0.6 meter-wide mirrors to capture the flickering starlight.

Since plenty of other things could cause a star to dim, one has to keep looking to see if the effect repeats itself on a regular basis, each time the planet completes an orbit. That’s one reason why the team decided to concentrate their search on dim, red stars. A planet would have to orbit rather close to such a star in order to be warm enough to support life. Close planets orbit more quickly; thus we have many more chances to see them dim the starlight, and each time we see that dimming we are more confident that the planet (or planets, in this case) is really there. What is more, with seven planets it takes a lot of observations to sort out the rhythm of dimmings into seven regular periods. This discovery did not come in one moment of revelation, but only after years of patient observing.

To further increase our faith that these are really planets, the scientists looked for other effects that such planets would have on the star, such as a subtle shifting of its spectral colors. The small flickers seen in a small telescope led to an international effort involving some of the biggest and most sophisticated instruments at our disposal. Besides the TRAPPIST South telescope, the astronomers relied on data from the NASA’s Spitzer space telescope (which observes in the infrared light that this star mostly radiates) and the European Southern Observatory’s VLT (Very Large Telescope) in Paranal, Chile, whose mirror is more than eight meters wide.

No one astronomer could have made all the observations needed to confirm the result. Science is done by a community of people working together toward a common goal. The European Southern Observatory is itself a consortium of astronomers supported by fifteen European nations, plus Brazil.

Astronomy is not stars or planets, but the activity of the people who look at those stars and planets. It is human curiosity, the desire to feed the human soul, that motivates this work. Human longings to know how we fit into this universe, and whether there are other places or even other beings like ourselves, excites our imaginations and keeps us looking patiently, night after night. That passion fuels the faith of the astronomers, giving them the hope they need that their long nights of observing will bear fruit.

Of course, along with passion and faith, scientists are also moved by other appetites… and a sense of humor. The Belgian astronomers who built the TRAPPIST telescopes admit that they chose the name to honor the famous beers made by Belgian Trappists!
Br. Guy Consolmagno

About Br. Guy Consolmagno

Brother Guy Consolmagno SJ is Director of the the Vatican Observatory and President of the Vatican Observatory Foundation. A native of Detroit, Michigan, he earned undergraduate and masters' degrees from MIT, and a Ph. D. in Planetary Science from the University of Arizona; he was a postdoctoral research fellow at Harvard and MIT, served in the US Peace Corps (Kenya), and taught university physics at Lafayette College before entering the Jesuits in 1989.

At the Vatican Observatory since 1993, his research explores connections between meteorites, asteroids, and the evolution of small solar system bodies, observing Kuiper Belt comets with the Vatican's 1.8 meter telescope in Arizona, and applying his measure of meteorite physical properties to understanding asteroid origins and structure. Along with more than 200 scientific publications, he is the author of a number of popular books including Turn Left at Orion (with Dan Davis), and most recently Would You Baptize an Extraterrestial? (with Father Paul Mueller, SJ). He also has hosted science programs for BBC Radio 4, been interviewed in numerous documentary films, appeared on The Colbert Report, and for more than ten years he has written a monthly science column for the British Catholic magazine, The Tablet.

Dr. Consolmagno's work has taken him to every continent on Earth; for example, in 1996 he spent six weeks collecting meteorites with a NASA team on the blue ice regions of East Antarctica. He has served on the governing boards of the Meteoritical Society; the American Astronomical Society Division for Planetary Sciences (of which he was chair in 2006-2007); and IAU Commission 16 (Planets and Satellites). In 2000, the small bodies nomenclature committee of the IAU named an asteroid, 4597 Consolmagno, in recognition of his work. In 2014 he received the Carl Sagan Medal from the American Astronomical Society Division for Planetary Sciences for excellence in public communication in planetary sciences.

This blog is made possible by contributions from visitors like yourself.
PLEASE help by supporting this blog.

Get the VOF Blog via email - free!

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Comments

The Beer and the Telescope — 5 Comments

  1. Wow! I wish I could rip off writing on demand like that! In *one hour*?!?

    Discovering these planets is super-duper-DUPER cool. But from a historical perspective that faith that life is out there has a track record that is not so great. The grumpy curmudgeon in me begs the reader to consider the following:

    “The Modern Solar System, the Diversity of Worlds, and William Whewell”
    http://www.vofoundation.org/blog/whewell-modern-solar-system-diversity-worlds/

    and

    “Life as We Know It”
    http://magazine.nd.edu/news/life-as-we-know-it/

  2. Pingback: The Beer and the Telescope – Observatorio Astronómico del Vaticano comunidad religiosa de la Compañía de Jesús en Castel Gandolfo

  3. Wonderful articles, both of them, Christopher. I had not seen the Notre Dame Magazine one, well done!

    Of course another issue I have with the way people interpret the Copernican revolution is the idea that humanity was somehow demoted when we were no longer the “center of the universe”. In the medieval view, we were NOT at the center, but at the bottom! Indeed, if location meant importance, then Satan in the Inferno, presumed to be under the Earth, would be even more important that we were!

    The Copernican revolution raised Earth to the status of the other planets. Or, maybe, demoted all the planets down to Earth’s status!

  4. Had to go back and review those previous posts. I remember reading, and enjoying!
    It leaves me pleasantly settled and unsettled simultaneously.
    Somebody has already said this (here?), but Life, because of the size of the universe is so wonderfully statistically imperatively both abundant, and rare.
    I think I am grateful for the Copernican revolution. I am not at the center of the (physical and metaphysical) Universe, so I can quietly sit off to the side for a while, and enjoy the view when drinking my beer.
    HA! Is that how Astronomy was started?
    Thanks again for the insight.

    • On the subject of raising Earth to the status of a planet, or demoting planets to Earth:

      I once heard Dennis Danielson (author of “The First Copernican” — https://www.amazon.com/First-Copernican-Joachim-Rheticus-Revolution/dp/0802715303) give an interesting analogy about this. A lot of people did not like how Pluto was demoted out of “planet” status. In fact, I still hear gripes about that from the general public. And the vast majority of people have never seen Pluto — it’s just something they read about in books or see in pictures. Well, he notes, Copernicus demoted the SUN out of planet status (because he moved it to the center, or bottom, as Guy points out, of the universe)….

Leave a Reply